WebOpinion for Trezevant v. City of Tampa, 746 F.2d 815 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, ... October 11th, 1984 ... City of Tampa. 83-3038, 83-3370. United States Court of Appeals Eleventh Circuit. 10/11/84. M.D.Fla., 741 F.2d 336. Newsletter. Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and ... WebCase 741 f2d 336 Trezevant v City of Tampa - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site. Case 741 f2d 336 Trezevant V City of Tampa
Trezevant V City Of Tampa 741 F.2d 336 [qvnd0xe9dg4x]
On the morning of April 23, 1979, the plaintiff, James C. Trezevant, was en route from his home in northwest Hillsborough County to his office in central Tampa. When he reached the intersection of Habana Avenue and Columbus Drive he stopped for a red light, he was third in line at the intersection. When the light … See more The City of Tampa and the HBCJ contend that the trial court erred in failing to grant a directed verdict in their favor. A directed verdict decides … See more Mr. Trezevant has challenged the trial court's determination to sever the time spent on the unsuccessful counts from the fee award and its … See more The defendants have also challenged the amount of the award and contend that the amount is excessive. The standard for review of this issue was stated in Del Casal v. Eastern … See more For the reasons stated, we find that the jury verdict was supported by sufficient evidence; the verdict was not excessive; and, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in setting the attorney fee award. Accordingly, … See more WebTREZEVANT V. CITY OF TAMPA 241 F.2d 336 (11th Cir. 1984) set the precedence for unlawful detainment fir $1,086 per minute, $75,000 per hour, and $1,800,000 per day. This case has never been... navigablestring\\u0027 object has no attribute href
Trezevant v. Tampa, 741 F.2d 336 - Archive
WebCity of Tampa (1984) 741 F.2d 336, hn. 1 "Jury verdict of $25,000 in favor of motorist who was unconstitutionally deprived of his liberty when incarcerated during booking process following citation for traffic violation was not excessive in view of evidence of motorist's back pain during period of incarceration and jailor's refusal to provide medical treatment, … WebCity of Tampa, 741 F.2d 336 (11th Cir. 1984); Meridian Investing & Development Corporation v. Suncoast Highland Corporation, 628 F.2d 370 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. Beer, 518 F.2d 168 (5th Cir. 1975); Hill v. WebTrezevant v. City of Tampa, 741 F.2d 336 (11th Cir.1984) (jury verdict of $25,000 in favor of motorist who was incarcerated during booking process following citation for traffic violation was not excessive); Carter v. Duncan-Huggins Ltd., 727 F.2d 1225 (D.C.Cir.1984) ... marketo retention policy